Додому Latest News and Articles Ford Recalls Over 400,000 Explorers Due to Suspension Failure Risk

Ford Recalls Over 400,000 Explorers Due to Suspension Failure Risk

Ford is recalling 412,774 Explorer SUVs from the 2017-2019 model years due to a critical suspension defect. The issue centers on rear suspension toe links, which can fracture under certain driving conditions, potentially leading to loss of steering control and increased crash risk.

The Problem and What Ford Knows

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) first flagged the issue after receiving reports of steering failures in several 2018 Explorer models. Ford subsequently investigated, finding 26 additional cases of toe link fractures. While the precise cause remains unknown, preliminary findings suggest a seizing cross-axis ball joint (CABJ) creates excessive stress on the toe link, ultimately causing it to break.

The automaker has confirmed two incidents where vehicles collided with roadside barriers following a toe link fracture, though no injuries have been reported to date.

What Ford is Doing

Owners of affected vehicles will be notified beginning next month and instructed to bring their SUVs to a Ford dealer for repair. The automaker will replace the faulty toe links with stronger components designed to resist seizing – a solution that addresses the suspected root cause of the problem.

A Recurring Issue

This isn’t an isolated incident. Ford previously recalled Explorers for similar toe link fractures in 2021. Notably, vehicles manufactured after that initial recall were still fitted with the same suspect CABJ parts made by SAF, suggesting a persistent supply chain issue or design oversight.

The recall highlights the ongoing challenges automakers face in ensuring component reliability, even after prior fixes. While recalls are inconvenient, they are a crucial step in addressing potentially dangerous defects before widespread harm occurs.

This recall underscores the importance of vigilance in automotive safety. Ford’s prompt action is a positive step, but the recurrence of this issue raises questions about long-term quality control and supplier oversight.

Exit mobile version